I was never able to execute flying successfully on a consistent basis. I instantly knew my answer for last week’s Hot Topic: the cape flying in Super Mario World on the SNES. Makes you wonder how much of other games could be removed, in the spirit of doing something different, and they’d be absolutely fine. I have no great preference one way or the other, I just think it’s interesting how easily something you would’ve argued was central to the game’s appeal is just done away with in one swoop. This new statue thing, and everything else we’ve seen of the Tears Of The Kingdom so far has no sign of the green suit and I imagine that means that it’ll once again just bee an Easter egg and that’s it. His green outfit and silly hate used to be absolutely iconic and yet all it took was one good game to completely change his design and for, almost, nobody to complain. Apart from saying goodbye to the last visual nod to the Wii U what interests me is how quickly and effectively Nintendo has been able to change the look of Link. I think it’s pretty clear now that Link’s robot arm is replacing the Sheikah Slate and is the source of his magic abilities. I actually think that can account for a lot of Sony’s success: their games are big budget and high-tech but never over the top, so they actually get finished on time and have some creative control, instead of being too big to take a risk with.
There is truth in saying that throwing people at a problem (the Microsoft solution to most things) is rarely a good idea but going to the other extreme is just as bad. I completely agree that Game Freak are overworked and understaffed but again, if that is bringing in the money than the profits are going to be much higher with things the way they are now compared to hiring a few thousand extra people.
As far as Nintendo is concerned the last few games, and the upcoming new ones, are big step forwards, including in terms of technology. Much as it pains me to say, nothing is going to change about Pokémon until the games start to sell less than they did.
#Team fortress classic characters movie#
The novelty of the game was how cinematic it was, but when you’re making a show or movie that doesn’t make a difference anymore. Especially as the basic story of The Last Of Us is just another zombie apocalypse. I just have a bad feeling about the whole thing. I mean, is that how Hollywood – or whatever you want to call HBO – thinks of us? Below comic books in the pecking order of storytelling medium? The only legitimate reason I can think of is if the game is so close to the show that they don’t want them imitating it, but even if that’s a good idea why make a show that is literally just the game without the gameplay?
#Team fortress classic characters tv#
Would they have said the same thing if it was an adaptation of a book, TV show, or comic book? I think not. I’m struggling to understand why this might be and, to be honest, seems to once again show a snobbish attitude towards games even, and especially, when they’re the source material. I’ve read that neither of the two stars of The Last Of Us have played the game and have in fact been told not to by the show makers. If Overwatch 2 is meant to stop that I don’t think it’s going to work for long. The whole sequel concept seems poorly thought out and kind of a kneejerk reaction to the original losing players. I still think it was a mistake not to include a story mode, as a lot of that online talk is about the characters and lore, and I have no idea where people get that stuff from.
0 kommentar(er)
